cAMP, the intracellular signaling molecule produced in response to GPCR signaling, has long been recognized as an immunosuppressive agent that inhibits T cell receptor activation and T cell function. However, recent studies show that cAMP also promotes T cell–mediated immunity. Central to cAMP production downstream of GPCR activation is the trimeric G protein Gs. In order to reconcile the reports of divergent effects of cAMP in T cells and to define the direct effect of cAMP in T cells, we engineered mice in which the stimulatory Gα subunit of Gs (Gαs) could be deleted in T cells using CD4-Cre (GnasΔCD4). GnasΔCD4 CD4+ T cells had reduced cAMP accumulation and Ca2+ influx. In vitro and in vivo, GnasΔCD4 CD4+ T cells displayed impaired differentiation to specific Th subsets: Th17 and Th1 cells were reduced or absent, but Th2 and regulatory T cells were unaffected. Furthermore, GnasΔCD4 CD4+ T cells failed to provoke colitis in an adoptive transfer model, indicating reduced inflammatory function. Restoration of cAMP levels rescued the impaired phenotype of GnasΔCD4 CD4+ T cells, reinstated the PKA-dependent influx of Ca2+, and enhanced the ability of these cells to induce colitis. Our findings thus define an important role for cAMP in the differentiation of Th subsets and their subsequent inflammatory responses, and provide evidence that altering cAMP levels in CD4+ T cells could provide an immunomodulatory approach targeting specific Th subsets.
Xiangli Li, Fiona Murray, Naoki Koide, Jonathan Goldstone, Sara M. Dann, Jianzhong Chen, Samuel Bertin, Guo Fu, Lee S. Weinstein, Min Chen, Maripat Corr, Lars Eckmann, Paul A. Insel, Eyal Raz
Usage data is cumulative from February 2019 through February 2020.
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.