Tacrolimus/sirolimus vs tacrolimus/methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis after matched, related donor allogeneic HCT

C Cutler, B Logan, R Nakamura… - Blood, The Journal …, 2014 - ashpublications.org
C Cutler, B Logan, R Nakamura, L Johnston, S Choi, D Porter, WJ Hogan, M Pasquini
Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2014ashpublications.org
Abstract Grades 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in approximately 35% of
matched, related donor (MRD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)
recipients. We sought to determine if the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus (Tac/Sir)
was more effective than tacrolimus and methotrexate (Tac/Mtx) in preventing acute GVHD
and early mortality after allogeneic MRD HCT in a phase 3, multicenter trial. The primary end
point of the trial was to compare 114-day grades 2-4 acute GVHD-free survival using an …
Abstract
Grades 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurs in approximately 35% of matched, related donor (MRD) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. We sought to determine if the combination of tacrolimus and sirolimus (Tac/Sir) was more effective than tacrolimus and methotrexate (Tac/Mtx) in preventing acute GVHD and early mortality after allogeneic MRD HCT in a phase 3, multicenter trial. The primary end point of the trial was to compare 114-day grades 2-4 acute GVHD-free survival using an intention-to-treat analysis of 304 randomized subjects. There was no difference in the probability of day 114 grades 2-4 acute GVHD-free survival (67% vs 62%, P = .38). Grades 2-4 GVHD was similar in the Tac/Sir and Tac/Mtx arms (26% vs 34%, P = .48). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment were more rapid in the Tac/Sir arm (14 vs 16 days, P < .001; 16 vs 19 days, P = .03). Oropharyngeal mucositis was less severe in the Tac/Sir arm (peak Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale score 0.70 vs 0.96, P < .001), but otherwise toxicity was similar. Chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years were no different between study arms (53% vs 45%, P = .06; 53% vs 54%, P = .77; and 59% vs 63%, P = .36). Based on similar long-term outcomes, more rapid engraftment, and less oropharyngeal mucositis, the combination of Tac/Sir is an acceptable alternative to Tac/Mtx after MRD HCT. This study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Cancer Institute; and the trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00406393.
ashpublications.org